well isn't right, either.
Personally, I'd expect anyone with... less than stellar, let's call
'em... intentions to find a more private forum. This is a public
list, anyone can see what's posted just by signing up.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:32:32 -0800 (PST), ggroess@yahoo.com wrote:
>I think the line that you are trying to describe is the same one the Supreme Court used in decidingJacobellis v. Ohio
>"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I
>understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core
>pornography"]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing
>so. But I know it when I see it," JusticePotter Stewart.
>
>It is not the subject that is trouble...it is the method the subject was described.
>
>
>Greg Groess
>greg@curvemeister.com
--
Keith E.
Excrementum casus
------------------------------------
Please check out our sister group, attachments allowed-Photoshop by Example http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ps-by-ex/ Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/photoshop-beginners/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/photoshop-beginners/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
photoshop-beginners-digest@yahoogroups.com
photoshop-beginners-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
photoshop-beginners-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment