Exactly, it was how it was presented, like they were describing some kind of fantasy. -------Original Message-------
I think the line that you are trying to describe is the same one the Supreme Court used in deciding Jacobellis v. Ohio "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it," Justice Potter Stewart. Greg Groess greg@curvemeister.com | ||
|
__._,_.___
No comments:
Post a Comment