i was not suggesting that an out of focus image can be made better by sharpening it, what i am saying ..that ok..best example i can give, i make a layer in photoshop, exact duplicate of original, and then i go to set it to"screen" the entire layer, which lightens it up, then i will copy that layer if i need to make it a bit lighter and lower the opacity from there..so when i do this, i can see a difference in the beginning to where nothing was done to the two layers i add....so this is where i am left with an image that is somewhat less than it was to begin with sharp wise..and i then take it into another program entirely, after saving as a jpg, and sharpen it...i dont like the sharpen parts of the photoshop, as i find it doesnt clear it as much as it just emphasizes the outer linings, and when i sharpen in the other program, i dont have to also blur certain parts of it..if that makes sense
I have uploaded 4 images to the folder to show the differences between Unsharp Mask, High pass, Smart Sharpen as well as a final image with tonal adjustments.
The settings for the filters are a part of the file names. Each filter was added to the file as a layer adjusted; and then deleted. No actual harm came to the photo during the process. I did however bother billions of electrons... ;)
Greg Groess
Greg@curvemeister.com
__._,_.___
Please check out our sister group, attachments allowed-Photoshop by Example http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ps-by-ex/
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment